- AI Odyssey
- Posts
- Content creators fight back against AI
Content creators fight back against AI
PLUS: AI in 2024...Five trends workers need to know!
Hello! OpenAI contends that creating advanced AI tools like ChatGPT would be "impossible" without utilizing copyrighted material, citing the necessity of training on a vast dataset sourced from the internet, much of which is protected by copyright, amidst increasing scrutiny on AI firms for the content used in their product development, as exemplified by the recent New York Times lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft.
PRESENTED BY CONTENTFUL
With generative AI and composable content, the possibilities are as limitless as your team’s creativity. As the leading intelligent composable content platform, Contentful enables developers and marketers alike to easily deliver on-brand experiences at speed and scale-all within one content system. Get started.
⏰ Top Headlines
🔗AI PCs: Nvidia propels AI PC evolution with new chips, asserts market dominance with superior performance.
🔗AI legal: Judges in England and Wales are given cautious approval to use AI in writing legal opinions.
🔗AI-powered plagiarism: Billionaire investor Bill Ackman asserts that AI-powered plagiarism checks, capable of swiftly uncovering academic misconduct, will bring "incredible embarrassment" to academia, escalating his campaign against university elites, while contemplating the potential ramifications of such technology on higher education.
🔗AI cars: Volkswagen says it’s putting ChatGPT in its cars for ‘enriching conversations’
🔗Another one: Two more authors, Nicholas Basbanes and Nicholas Gage, have filed a class action lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, as reported by Reuters.
Getty and Nvidia bring generative AI to stock photos
Getty Images and Nvidia team up to launch Generative AI by iStock, a user-friendly text-to-image platform catering to small and medium businesses. This innovative tool transforms text prompts into customized stock photos, streamlining creative workflows.
Precision and efficiency: Generative AI by iStock, fueled by Nvidia's Picasso model, exclusively learns from Getty's creative and iStock's stock photo libraries. It empowers individual users to efficiently generate tailored visuals without elaborate photoshoots.
Accessible creativity: Ideal for businesses, the AI allows users to prompt specific requests, enabling quick and unique visuals. For instance, illustrating climate change with penguins in a cityscape can be achieved seamlessly without traditional photography methods.
Pricing and legal framework: Priced at $14.99 for 100 prompts, the platform introduces a tiered pricing structure. Legal indemnification differs from Getty Images, with a $10,000 cap per asset. The platform aligns with Getty's revenue-sharing model.
Innovative features: Generative AI by iStock introduces Inpainting for masking and filling areas with objects based on text prompts, along with Outpainting for photo expansion across various aspect ratios.
This user-friendly AI tool marks a significant leap in personalized stock photo creation, offering businesses accessibility, efficiency, and innovative features in the dynamic realm of artificial intelligence and creative content generation.
Artificial echoes: AI, Warhol, and the battle over creative ownership
Pop art meets controversy in a class-action lawsuit against Midjourney, accusing its AI-driven art lab of copying iconic artists like Andy Warhol. Filed a year ago, the lawsuit alleges Midjourney's generative AI is a "parasite" copying famous artworks.
Artists in the AI spotlight: Warhol, Lichtenstein, and Fairey are at the heart of the legal battle, with their works allegedly in Midjourney's database, fueling a debate on AI's role in art and accusations of creative exploitation.
Fair use or infringement?: Legal experts weigh in on whether Midjourney's actions constitute fair use or copyright infringement, with the lawsuit adding complexity to the evolving intersection of art, technology, and copyright law.
AI art's legal landscape: The recent Supreme Court decision on the Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith case and the ongoing Midjourney lawsuit raise critical questions about compensating creators and the future of AI art, challenging traditional notions of creativity and ownership.
In this clash between art and technology, the Midjourney lawsuit becomes a pivotal moment, unveiling the complexities and consequences of AI's impact on creativity and ownership within the art community.
Content creators fight back against AI
In a David-versus-Goliath showdown, content creators are grabbing their pitchforks and torches to take on Big Tech's AI behemoths.
Picture it: a rebellion brewing against the silicon overlords as news providers and creatives declare war on the very AI that might one day render them obsolete.
Lawsuits on steroids: Strap in for a legal rollercoaster, folks. Heavy hitters like the New York Times are throwing punches at OpenAI and Microsoft, accusing them of pilfering journalistic content to fuel their AI beasts. It's a digital heist, and creators want their fair share or, at the very least, some answers.
Creatives in crisis: Content creators aren't just battling for their wallets; they're fighting for survival. Not only are they getting the short end of the revenue stick for their content, but the looming threat of AI disruption could turn the past two decades of Big Tech exploitation into a quaint bedtime story.
AI: The grand finale of surveillance capitalism: Cue the ominous music because AI, led by OpenAI and Microsoft, is the grand finale of surveillance capitalism. Chatbots like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Bard are serving up direct answers, cutting out the middleman – creators. It’s a high-stakes game where Big Tech emerges as the ultimate winner, raking in profits while creators are left holding the digital scraps.
As the curtain rises on this dystopian drama, content creators are rallying their digital armies, ready to face down the AI juggernauts. The battle cries echo: fair compensation, protection against AI obsolescence, and a plea for Big Tech to acknowledge the true worth of the content they've devoured. In the ever-evolving saga of creators versus the machine, who will emerge victorious?
AI in 2024: Five trends workers need to know
AI is set to reshape the workplace in 2024, bringing both opportunities and challenges. Here are the key trends:
Inclusivity boost: AI will empower workers with disabilities through tools like speech-to-text and text-to-speech, fostering independence and inclusion.
Fairer hiring and layoffs: HR professionals are using AI to address bias in hiring processes. Companies, like Deloitte, are exploring AI to allocate resources efficiently and minimize layoffs, benefiting marginalized groups.
Diversity-centric practices: AI development may lead to increased regulatory focus on funding worker inclusion practices, ensuring protection of workers' rights.
Upskilling emphasis: As AI coexists with human roles, companies are investing in upskilling programs, workshops, and partnerships to help employees adapt.
Regulatory challenges: Defining AI boundaries and protecting human rights pose challenges, necessitating global collaboration for effective regulation. Concerns about job security and workplace privacy are driving stress and anxiety among workers.
In essence, AI is here to stay, demanding swift adaptation from both employees and businesses in the ever-evolving workplace.
💬 More on AI…
🔗Uncensored AI: Meta and OpenAI have spawned a wave of AI sex companions—and some of them are children.
🔗Trains: AI's simple solution to rail problems: stop all trains running.
🔗AI forward: How 2024 will be AI’s ‘leap forward’
🔗AI is making it harder to deal with bug reports. Daniel Stenberg, the Curl programming language’s lead developer, writes that AI is gumming up the works in bug reporting.